| June
16, 1976 Background and the aftermath
JUNE 16 1976, BACKGROUND AND AFTERMATH
The eruption of student uprisings in June 1976 has to be seen in
its proper perspective.
Today, organisations and individuals have claimed responsibility
for the uprising. However, events prior to June 16, 1976 will show
that no one other than the students themselves, under the leadership
of the South African Student’s Movement (SASM), can claim
responsibility. To this end, we will look at events prior to the
day in terms of :
- Political trends obtaining at that time.
- The Afrikaans Issue
- The aftermath
POLITICAL TRENDS
From its inception, the South African Students’ Organisation
( SASO) and thus the Black Consciousness philosophy, had maintained
that it recognised the historical existence of other liberation
movements. Thus, Black Consciousness ( B.C.) did not see itself
as an alternative to them but recognised its role in liberating
the Black people of Azania. Emphasis was initially placed on the
psychological liberation, which was the driving force behind the
student uprisings of 1976.
All Black organisations that were operating above board in that
period were doing so under the broad banner of B.C. - there was
this common understanding and approach to the liberation of the
country. Even organisations such as the Inkatha Cultural Movement,
which were at odds with the B.C.M. on a number of issues - such
as operating within the Bantustan system, were appreciative of B.C.
Thus prior to 1976, the Black community did not have the political
cleavages currently obtaining. Consultations were held across known
political affiliations. Therefore, the Black People’s Convention
(B.P.C.), could easily consult with the known members of the other
organisations. Co-operation and consultation were in all events
the norm.
THE AFRIKAANS ISSUE
If there is anybody who could claim responsibility for the June
16 1976 Uprisings, it could be Dr Andries Treurnicht, who was then
the Deputy Minister in the Department of Bantu Administration, Development
and Education in charge of Bantu Education, under Minister M.C.
Botha. His Memorandum to School Boards, Inspectors and Principals
instructing them to use Afrikaans as a medium of instruction was
the direct cause of the unrest.
The first group to respond to these instructions was the Tswana
School Boards. As early as January 1976, these school boards in
Meadowlands, Dobsonville and other areas under the Tswana School
Boards had taken an attitude towards this instruction. An excerpt
from the minutes of the Meadowlands Tswana School Board of the 20
January 1976 is instructive :
“ The circuit inspector told the board that the Secretary
for Bantu Education has stated that all direct taxes paid by the
Black population of South Africa are being sent to the various homelands
for educational purposes there.
“In urban areas the education of a Black child is being paid
for by the White population, that is English and Afrikaans speaking
groups. Therefore the Secretary for the Bantu Education has the
responsibility of satisfying the English and Afrikaans speaking
people. Consequently, as the only way of satisfying both groups,
the medium of instruction in all schools shall be on a 50-50 basis....
In future, if schools teach through a medium not prescribed by the
department for a particular subject, examination question papers
will only be set in the medium with no option of the other language”.
The objection of the Tswana school boards was that the control
of their school boards had shifted to the Bophuthatswana government
in terms of government legislation and that the central government
no longer had any jurisdiction on them.
The B.P.C., through its Secretary General, Thandisizwe Mazibuko,
participated in all meetings called by the Tswana School Board,
together with Thomas Manthata in his capacity as an official of
the South African Council of Churches. As a matter of fact, at the
time of the outbreak of the unrest, the B.P.C. and the Tswana School
Board had engaged services of a lawyer to work on an interdict against
the Minister.
In the meantime, the students in SOWETO had formed the Student
Representative Council
( S.R.C.) And were involved in consultations with all organisations
and individuals of note in the community.
The B.P.C. was in a better position to liaise with the SRC in that
some members of the organisation had been teachers in some of the
SOWETO High Schools like Sekano Ntoane, Naledi and Orlando West
High. People like Tom Manthata, Sammy Tloubatla and Aubrey Mokoena
were active members of B.P.C.
It must however be made very clear that the planning of the March
was left to the students. Advice was given where sought. The week-end
before the fateful June 16 day, a meeting was held between the students
and members of the B.P.C. to finalise the strategy for the march.
Earlier it was mentioned that the cornerstone of the B.C. philosophy
was psychological liberation. The Afrikaans issue was seen by the
students and the community at large as part of a strategy by the
National Party to oppress Black people psychologically. Thus, ways
and means had to be found to counter this threat. The war of psychological
liberation was therefore imminent.
AFTERMATH
It is ironic that the first among the known political activists
of the day to be arrested was George Wauchope, who was the Chairman
of the Johannesburg Central Branch of the B.P.C.
Magauta Molefe, Administrative Secretary at the Head Office of
the B.P.C., followed. By the end of July 1976 almost all active
members of the B.P.C. in Johannesburg had been detained, including
the President, Hlaku Rachidi and the Secretary General, Thandisizwe
Mazibuko.
It is of interest to note that the Soviet KGB sent one their agents,
Major Koslov, to investigate claims by some externally based organisation
that they were responsible for the uprising. This officer, who was
arrested by the Boers, reported unfavourably on their involvement
in this national uprising.
The flood of young people into exile after the uprisings served
as a serious indictment on all the liberation movements. The fact
is that prior to June 1976, there wasn’t enough pressure exerted
on the South African regime militarily either because the organisations
lacked the capacity or the political will to do so. Let the matter
rest here.
The formation of the United Democratic Front (UDF), which the B.C.
camp aptly named Uniroyal, Dunlop and Firestone after the tyre companies
because of the number of necklace murders they carried out against
anybody that disagreed with them or presented better arguments to
theirs, was an effort on part of one of these organisations to show
a presence in the country.
The wars between the UDF and AZAPO are history. However, things
have to be put in their proper perspective. In 1978 at the Modder
Bee Prison where most activists were imprisoned after the banning
of the B.C. organisations, some turn coats, as one would expect
them, went all out to attack the B.P.C. and the Black Consciousness
Philosophy. This came as a result of a Radio Freedom broadcast which
condemned the Committee of Ten - forerunner to today’s civic
movement in the country - and thus the B.P.C. as “sell-outs”
who deserved the firing squad. This broadcast was heard by many
inmates at the Modder Bee Prison.
In 1979, some of these turn coats went about telling members of
the Azanian People’s Organisation (AZAPO), which was founded
on the 28th April 1978 and had most of its leadership harassed,
imprisoned and banned, that if they did not disband by the end of
July 1979, they would not be held responsible for what would happen
to AZAPO and B.C. adherents. Several meetings called to try and
address these tensions failed and that in fact was the beginning
of the “politics of intolerance” and political hegemony
among the oppressed in the country.
In 1980, the last Secretary General of B.P.C. Mpotseng Kgokong,
both banned and restricted to Johannesburg, tried unsuccessfully
to intervene to stop an ugly campaign waged by ex-SASO office bearer
and two clerics from the Christian Institute against former members
of the B.P.C. and AZAPO. AZAPO was labelled a CIA front by these
crusaders.
In 1985, at their conference held at Kabwe in Zambia, they resolved
to “liquidate” the B.C.M.
This directive from abroad was carried with gusto by the U.D.F.
inside the country. Hence the cruel and painful deaths of so many
of our cadres who sacrificed so much to make this country a worthwhile
place to live in.
Very inflammatory statements against AZAPO in this same year made
by one cleric after the abortive Ted Kennedy visit to South Africa
did not make things any easy.
It is indeed ironic and sad that some of the B.C. cadres that fled
the country in the mid-eighties to seek political asylum in foreign
countries did so not in flight from savage Boer repression, but
form the UDF activists who were hunting them down with obvious intention
of killing them in the savage manner that they had grown accustomed
to and which had become their trade mark, the necklace - Black South
Africa’s curse of the century!
The cold, cruel and systematic isolation of the B.C. cadre in exile
should also be mentioned.
These are the people who could tell the truth about the unfolding
political events in the country. But, they were expected to perpetuate
the lie that someone else who had no idea of the unfolding events
in the country, was responsible for them. Most of these cadres were
politically moulded in the noble B.C. philosophy and were principled
enough to agree to be used in this brazen manner. We count Cde Tsietsi
Mashinini amongst these gallant sons and daughters of Azania.
This isolation was calculated to throttle these cadres into total
submission. Fortunately, that failed.
All these things were done with the misplaced hope that the B.C.M.
would be removed from the South African political arena. How wrong
they were !
CONCLUSION
Black Consciousness has in its years of existence in South Africa
(since 1st July 1969 ), gone through unparalled repression and hostility
from the state and its ideological opponents alike. In terms of
leadership, we have lost more men and women than any other organisation
at the hands of the Boer regime and our political opponents in the
Black community. We have survived this and gone through it with
a great measure of dignity. We stand for the truth and shall forever
uphold it.
BLACK POWER !!! BLACK POWER !!! BLACK POWER !!!
ONE AZANIA - ONE NATION.
|