ADDRESS TO THE VAAL BRANCH OF THE BLACK MANAGEMENT FORUM ON
17 AUGUST 2001AT THE RIVIERA HOTEL, VEREENIGING BY MR. MOSIBUDI MANGENA, DEPUTY
MINISTER OF EDUCATION
Topic: The
Challenge for the South African Education System
Friends
I am indeed grateful for
the opportunity to address this quarterly forum of the Black Management Forum’s
Vaal Branch. Let me therefore begin by commending you for initiating this
forum, which no doubt creates many valuable opportunities for your members to
reflect on your mission and your collective contribution to the development of
our people.
As I was
contemplating coming here it occurred to me that the Vaal has been the setting
for many events of great historical importance. It was here that the forces of
colonialism and oppression consolidated white oppression following the signing
of the Treaty of Vereeniging in 1902. Instead of striving toward democracy, the
Union created in 1910 laid the foundations to accelerate black oppression,
disenfranchisement and dispossession.
It was also in
the Vaal that the legitimate protest against black oppression in Sharpeville in
1960 was ruthlessly crushed, resulting in the massacre of our people.
These two
events are powerful reminders of a past that we would be well advised to bear in
mind as we chart the future for the children of this country. We should
jealously guard and protect our hard won democracy. As we nurture it we should
ensure that our children steadily but surely break from the shackles of poverty
and ignorance to become one of the winning nations of the world. Some among you
may find it hard to imagine that, little over a decade ago, we would not have
been able to meet in this venue on the beautiful banks of the Vaal River.
Many things
still continue to remind us of the ravages of our past. The horrible wounds inflicted by the effects
of apartheid education, land dispossession, influx control, job reservation,
legislative and judicial oppression will be difficult to heal. Only the naďve
believed that the deep consequences of colonialism would disappear with the
adoption of a new constitution and the onset of democracy.
Between 1975
and 1991, the income of the poorest 60% of the population – the overwhelming
majority of whom were black – dropped by 35%. Figures for 1996 show that the
gap between rich and poor was growing wider. These figures also show that the
poorest 20% of the population received a miniscule 1,5% of the total income,
compared to 65% received by the richest 10%.
This kind of
unequal human development contributes to social divisions and injustices. In
addition, we know from other countries, that huge income inequalities actually
serve to undermine economic development.
Inequalities
of this magnitude do not disappear overnight. Indeed, without direct intervention,
they are likely to get worse. The equation is frighteningly simple. People are
poor because they do not have access to jobs, they do not have access to
productive resources such as land and, even if they do, they often do not have
access to the finance that could enable them to exploit the productive
potential of the land. Further, as may also testify, poor people are often
those that had not had significant opportunities for education. Poverty is not
simply a condition; it is a cycle. If you are poor you cannot, on your own,
provide your children with the opportunity to access education because you do
not have the money to do so. You will not have the means for transportation.
You will not have the means to create a stimulating environment at home. You
will find it extremely difficult to provide minimum nutrition essential for
your children’s development. You will not have the means to provide them with
adequate health care. You will face difficult social challenges that militate
against your children’s safety, development and well being.
Poverty is a
cycle. It tends to trap generations of people into a grim existence. The Ministry of Education is well aware that
we need active government intervention to break the cycle of poverty. There is incontrovertible evidence from
across the world that education contributes to both economic development and
income distribution. Education and training therefore constitutes the central
lever in our strategy to eradicate poverty and reduce income inequalities in
our country.
One stark
reality we face is that job creation has been very slow in the economy. This is
partially explained by the capital-intensive structure of industrial
production. Of course, another reason relates to the fact that deficiencies in
education and training levels contribute to a lowering of labour productivity,
which can contribute to a slowdown in employment growth.
In response to
the above, the ministry has now commenced with the implementation of a
Mathematics, Science and Communication Technology Strategy as a part of the
national Human Resources Development strategy. I am privileged to spearhead the
Mathematics and Science strategy and as a part of my responsibilities.
In order for
this country to provide employment for all either through job creation or
employment on the formal labour market, there needs to be a level of scientific
and technological literacy high enough to sustain the expansion of the
economy. At present, the country does not
have the capacity to allow the economy to expand without importing foreign
scientific and technological expertise.
The last four decades has seen the systematic destruction of a culture
of learning within the country. This,
coupled with outdated teaching practices and lack of basic content knowledge,
has left us with a situation, where poor, under-qualified and unqualified
teachers teach learners in classrooms that are not only overcrowded but are
also under-equipped. This in turn has
produced a new generation of teachers who are further perpetuating the cycle of
mediocrity.
To aggravate this situation few learners who graduate in mathematics and science choose mathematics and science teaching as a career. Consequently, we are caught in a vicious cycle of under-supply of educators in these fields of study. Because of this most secondary schools do not offer mathematics and science. In schools where these subjects are offered, the majority of the educators are under-qualified. This situation is exacerbated by the lack of facilities and resources to enhance effective learning and teaching. The majority of schools that offer mathematics and science do not have facilities and equipment to promote effective learning and teaching. The teaching of science remains at a theoretical level without any experiments to enhance understanding and application of knowledge.
In the course of
addressing the above issues, two very critical points of departure were
identified. The first is a national
strategy for mathematics and science – a large-scale initiative to address the
inequities within the disciplines of mathematics and science at a national
level. The second is the creation of
mathematics and science centres of excellence - the 100 Schools Project - as
part of the National Strategy. The 100 Mathematics and Science Centres of
Excellence will be facilitated at national level and implemented by provincial
education departments. Provinces were
allocated schools according to need and they were also advised to select the
schools in such a way that they ensured that each area is covered. Many of these centres of excellence are
supposed to be located in disadvantaged and rural areas.
Many studies have shown a
positive link between education and improved worker productivity and
socioeconomic outcomes such as health, life expectancy and reduced fertility
rates. In addition to supporting economic growth, education also contributes to
other very necessary socio-economic outcomes. The education of women
contributes to the quality of early childhood development. Education
contributes to awareness of social, environmental and health-related issues,
and to the development of civic and political consciousness. Indeed, one of the
important outcomes of schooling is to develop an orientation conducive to
discipline, social responsibility and diligence. Good education has been shown to impact positively on the
development of particularly poor countries.
It must be
clear from all what I have said that, if differential provision of education
was an important cause of racial inequalities in South Africa, then the key
driver to eliminate racial inequality must relate to the dramatic improvement
of the quality and coverage of education for the majority.
We have
already made significant progress in education. We have excellent policies and
laws in education and training. Our percentage of children of school-going age
who are enrolled at school is among the highest in the developing world. We are
also making progress in redistributing government expenditure on education towards
the poor. In this regard, we have succeeded in equalizing the distribution of
educators between schools through the Rationalization and Redeployment process.
There has been a dramatic improvement in equity of government spending on
education between provinces and, through the National Norms and Standards for
School Funding, we have ensured that the poorest schools receive, on average,
seven times more government funding for non-personnel expenditure compared to
the least poor schools. On the quality side, the dramatic improvement in the
matriculation examination results of last year may be a pointer to better
things to come.
While we
celebrate our gains, it is important to acknowledge that many weaknesses and
shortcomings continue to plague the system. Large parts of the system are still
dysfunctional. Poor communities, particularly rural Africans, continue to
withstand the worst of rampant inequalities in the system. Teacher diligence is
sometimes worrying. There are obvious and inexcusable failures of governance
and management. Many of our educational institutions – schools, colleges,
universities and technikons – are plagued by a constant threat of physical
violence and mismanagement.
The Ministry
of Education is acting decisively to address these challenges. We are working
closely with Provincial Education Departments to ensure that the Education and
Training System improves in both quality and effectiveness so that it may live
up to its historical challenge.
The Education
and Training system is huge; we have about 12 million learners in the schooling
sector alone. It accounts for the largest proportion of government non-interest
spending. The daily operational and administrative functions are enormous and
complex.
We are working
hard to ensure that every aspect of this complex system functions effectively.
As we do this it is necessary, given the complexity of the challenges, that we
also focus on key priorities. These are:
ü
HIV/AIDS,
ü
School effectiveness and educator professionalism,
ü
Literacy,
ü
Further education and training,
ü
Organisational effectiveness of the national and provincial
departments, and
ü
Values in education
We have also
recently launched White Papers on Early Childhood Development and Education for
Learners with Special Needs. Following a rigorous review process, we have just
completed the process of streamlining Curriculum 2005. The new Curriculum
Statement is presently available for public comment and I want to urge you to
study the statement and to afford us the benefit of your comments.
There are many
examples of fine effort in improving education. I have visited a number of
schools since my appointment as Deputy Minister. The commitment, industry, and
creativity of our people, often under very difficult conditions, constantly
strike me. I have encountered many people across the social spectrum, who are
contributing tirelessly to the improvement of education. Many of you sitting in
this room are among these people. Some of you have made a direct contribution
and all of you serve as vital role models. You are a living symbol of
hope. You are living testimony to what
can be achieved through education and hard work. I call on you to become an
active role model by visiting schools and speaking to young people in your neighbourhoods.
I want to
reiterate that government has to play a central role in improving the quality,
effectiveness and coverage of education and training. However, government
cannot do this alone. We need a total mobilization of human endeavour, on a
scale even more intense than at any other time in our history, to take this
social project further. We have already entered the 21st century
with its exciting opportunities and daunting challenges. The hour is late!
Let me
conclude by saying that I feel extremely inspired and motivated to meet the
challenges that lie ahead. For our country, we will try hard to improve
education. And when we are done, we will try again. But we will not succeed
through government effort alone. Given the nature of education, success depends
on the effort of all people. The solutions lie in the hearts and minds of all.
Members of the
Black Management Forum can make a significant contribution to education and
development. You occupy influential positions in some of the most productive
sectors of the economy. The emerging policies on Black Economic Empowerment
hold promise to create the necessary conditions for effective redistribution
and sustained economic development. We have to ensure that the development and
distribution of education and training in society propels the thrust for Black
Economic Empowerment. It is you, and future managers still at school, who must
ensure that these necessary conditions are used to ameliorate the effects of
colonialism and racism, break the cycle of poverty and advance development.
Given the scope of education it is very difficult to cover all aspects that interest you. I will therefore be very happy to respond to any questions you may have. I wish you well with your future endeavours and thank you again for this opportunity to address you.